This past Sunday, roughly 100 ministers around the country stepped into their pulpits to break the law.
The pastors, with the backing of the conservative Christian nonprofit, Alliance Defense Fund, planned to challenge what is legally-acceptable speech within tax-exempt organizations in what they called Pulpit Freedom Sunday.
In particular, the pastors planned to test the boundaries of political speech. Since the 1950s, tax-exempt agencies are barred from, among other political activities, endorsing or opposing candidates, or, according to one IRS publication, devoting "a substantial part of their activities to attempting to influence legislation."
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Intelligence Report Envisions “Designing Humans With Unique Abilities” Under Global Governance Regime
Recently a document was disclosed by the grace of the Freedom of Information Act entitled Global Governance 2025: At a Critical Juncture. The document, written by the American National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the European Union’s Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), outlines the agenda from now to 2025 for global government. It discusses the many obstacles in the quest for achieving global government and discusses the possibility, the desirability, of “designing humans with unique physical, emotional, or cognitive abilities.”
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Falling Heroes
No government aid for those emergency workers exposed to toxic dust from WTC collapse...over 900 dead to date.
Cage Potato Exclusive Interview: Joe Rogan
We called up Joe Rogan earlier this week hoping to shoot the bull about tomorrow's UFC card. Instead, we got a full education about humanity's impending peak point, the thievery of war, Ashton Kutcher, and psychedelic Internet dance-porn. But that's how it goes with Joe, whether you're listening to his stand-up comedy CDs or watching him explain things to Mike Goldberg during UFC broadcasts — not only are you entertained, but you actually feel smarter afterwards. Of course, he did run down the GSP/Penn matchup for us, as well as share stories about his early days with the UFC and fill us in on his upcoming comedy special. So read on and be enlightened...
(CAUTION: language)
excerpt:
There’s a guy named Major Smedley Butler, who was the commander of the United States Marine Corps, and he wrote a speech in 1933 called War Is a Racket, which is fascinating if you read it in 2009. Because in 1933 this guy was talking about how when he was going to all these different places in the name of liberty and justice, really what he was doing was clearing the area for oil companies and making the area safe for bankers, and that basically war is just a means that the elite use to control the rest of the world. They go in and clear areas out so they can profit from them. And that’s been the case since the beginning of time. War is about profit and controlling resources. So do I believe in the Illuminati in that sense? Yes, I do. I do believe that wars are created for profit. And they always have been. And there’s evidence, these aren’t just speculations.
If you look at just this country over the last 50-60 years, in 1961 there was a document that was released called the Northwoods Document, which became available in the Freedom of Information act fairly recently, and this document was signed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff but was vetoed by Kennedy, and it was basically a plan to attack American civilians and to make it look like Cubans were doing it, in order to generate enthusiasm for a war against Cuba. It’s a false flag attack on Americans. They had plans to blow up an American jetliner, attack college students, all this s*** just to get people to be enthusiastic about a war with Cuba. And the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the reason why we got into Vietnam — which never happened. It was a fake attack, it was another false flag incident, another incident of the people in charge conspiring to create an excuse to go to war. So it that sense, the elite controlling the world, that’s f****** real.
read the full interview
Joe on Inside MMA:
(CAUTION: language)
excerpt:
There’s a guy named Major Smedley Butler, who was the commander of the United States Marine Corps, and he wrote a speech in 1933 called War Is a Racket, which is fascinating if you read it in 2009. Because in 1933 this guy was talking about how when he was going to all these different places in the name of liberty and justice, really what he was doing was clearing the area for oil companies and making the area safe for bankers, and that basically war is just a means that the elite use to control the rest of the world. They go in and clear areas out so they can profit from them. And that’s been the case since the beginning of time. War is about profit and controlling resources. So do I believe in the Illuminati in that sense? Yes, I do. I do believe that wars are created for profit. And they always have been. And there’s evidence, these aren’t just speculations.
If you look at just this country over the last 50-60 years, in 1961 there was a document that was released called the Northwoods Document, which became available in the Freedom of Information act fairly recently, and this document was signed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff but was vetoed by Kennedy, and it was basically a plan to attack American civilians and to make it look like Cubans were doing it, in order to generate enthusiasm for a war against Cuba. It’s a false flag attack on Americans. They had plans to blow up an American jetliner, attack college students, all this s*** just to get people to be enthusiastic about a war with Cuba. And the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the reason why we got into Vietnam — which never happened. It was a fake attack, it was another false flag incident, another incident of the people in charge conspiring to create an excuse to go to war. So it that sense, the elite controlling the world, that’s f****** real.
read the full interview
Joe on Inside MMA:
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
The Onion mocks lies and murder of 9/11
Satirical news agency The Onion has posted an article on their website entitled "Construction Complete On 9/11 Truther Memorial". Typically mocking the mundane and sometimes vulgar, the junior-high-humored "news" agency has overstepped it's usual bounds and acted in a manner that is completely inappropriate and laughs in the faces of the victims and their families as well as all those who refuse to give up the search for truth and justice.
While attempting to mock "truthers", the article gives a surprising amount of information about the events surrounding the attacks according to the so-called 9/11 truth movement. Specifically mentioned are the CIA/terrorist connection, remote control of airliners, explosive charges/WTC 7/controlled demolition, inability of jet fuel to melt the steel supporting the WTC structures, and the fact that the President continued to read to schoolchildren instead of being rushed to safety by the Secret Service detail.
Aside from the particulars, The Onion also includes the "laughable" background to the events, citing the Bilderberg Group, the Carlyle Group, the Trilateral Commission, and the New World Order. The article basically sums up the background to this supposedly ridiculous conspiracy by stating,
"...a labyrinthine network of federal agencies, defense contractors, and oil companies went to enormous lengths to make it look as though an Egyptian man leading a group of 15 Saudi Arabians had attacked the United States, then used this as a pretext for invading Iraq and Afghanistan to gain access to priceless Central Asian pipelines and begin devaluing the American dollar in preparation for an economic war with China that will plummet the global econ≠omy into a massive depression from which a single fascist corporate state will eventually emerge."
The writers at The Onion also seem to be a jab at "truthers" by invoking Ol' Reliable, Anti-Semitism: "several thousand Jews...received advanced warning not to go into work on 9/11". Surprisingly, this and little else is the extent to which the article attempts to manufacture false claims and attribute them to legitimately concerned people regarding the facts and evidence surrounding the events of September 11, 2001. However, the intent of the article is clear; to mock and undermine. But the attempt is hollow and juvenile at best, which only gives credit to those who are seeking justice and accountability.
read the original article
While attempting to mock "truthers", the article gives a surprising amount of information about the events surrounding the attacks according to the so-called 9/11 truth movement. Specifically mentioned are the CIA/terrorist connection, remote control of airliners, explosive charges/WTC 7/controlled demolition, inability of jet fuel to melt the steel supporting the WTC structures, and the fact that the President continued to read to schoolchildren instead of being rushed to safety by the Secret Service detail.
Aside from the particulars, The Onion also includes the "laughable" background to the events, citing the Bilderberg Group, the Carlyle Group, the Trilateral Commission, and the New World Order. The article basically sums up the background to this supposedly ridiculous conspiracy by stating,
"...a labyrinthine network of federal agencies, defense contractors, and oil companies went to enormous lengths to make it look as though an Egyptian man leading a group of 15 Saudi Arabians had attacked the United States, then used this as a pretext for invading Iraq and Afghanistan to gain access to priceless Central Asian pipelines and begin devaluing the American dollar in preparation for an economic war with China that will plummet the global econ≠omy into a massive depression from which a single fascist corporate state will eventually emerge."
The writers at The Onion also seem to be a jab at "truthers" by invoking Ol' Reliable, Anti-Semitism: "several thousand Jews...received advanced warning not to go into work on 9/11". Surprisingly, this and little else is the extent to which the article attempts to manufacture false claims and attribute them to legitimately concerned people regarding the facts and evidence surrounding the events of September 11, 2001. However, the intent of the article is clear; to mock and undermine. But the attempt is hollow and juvenile at best, which only gives credit to those who are seeking justice and accountability.
read the original article
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)